asb wrote:The cantor didn't know why it happened. We have weekly rehearsals, for cantors alone as well as full choir, and every singer has a detailed music list.. He had been having trouble with the syncopation in the verse for The Baptism, but had got it "sussed" and told me had been looking through it and singing it in his mind during the 2nd reading. The correct verse was the 2nd on the page - the 1st being the Epiphany verse which he sang by mistake but cannot explain why.
In other words, it was the sort of human error anyone is liable to make from time to time, especially when under pressure. You really cannot be blamed for that, asb – in fact it's even less blameworthy than your daughter's practical joke, for which your then priest over-reacted (IMHO).
asb wrote:The only way to avoid it would be to photocopy, which for obvious reasons cannot be done.
Copyright law is not an end in itself: it is there to ensure that authors, composers and publishers get a fair reward for the use of their work. I agree with Tsume Tsuyu: if you've bought enough books for you and the cantor to have one each (and no-one else is using them) then you're not cheating anyone by making a photocopy with pages blanked out and I'm sure no-one would prosecute you for doing so if that helps to solve your problem.
asb wrote:Or, more radically, drop this set of Acclamations and use ones where the verses can be sung to any psalm tone; had we been doing one of those, I could have gone with the flow and the mistake would have been less noticeable in as much as, ok, the wrong verse would have been sung, but we wouldn't have ended up with an "exchange" from the organ loft to the ambo!
Very true. Similarly, having realised that the cantor was singing the Epiphany verse, you could have jumped to the accompaniment for it and, apart from a brief hiatus, I doubt many people would have noticed or worried. Although I always try to give my singers the correct Psalm and acclamation verses, the PP wouldn't mind if we sang something different: we might get momentary flak from a pedant reading his Missal at the time but no more than that. However, that's hindsight and you needn't beat yourself up for not having thought of it in the particular split second when it all happened. On the other hand, you can learn from the experience and having had that idea store it up in case a similar situation arises.
asb wrote:OK. In a nutshell, rightly or wrongly, I live and work in a small town. I want to walk down the road, and be known as a bloke who helps to make the mass prayerful and edifying. Not the one responsible for big foul-ups!
The general feeling of the message board seems to be that this was a one-off foul-up and not a particularly catastrophic one at that, not "foul-ups" in the plural.
asb wrote:Incidentally, cantor was apparently on duty as usual at Mass yesterday!
Delighted to hear it! I hope next Sunday you'll be there as well, having agreed between the two of you and the PP to put the past behind you and also agreed how you can give yourselves the best chance to get it right next time and every time. Then you should be able to rebuild your reputation as a bloke who helps to make the Mass prayerful and edifying.