Ratzinger, Liturgy and England

Well it does to the people who post here... dispassionate and reasoned debate, with a good deal of humour thrown in for good measure.

Moderators: Dom Perignon, Casimir

User avatar
TimSharrock
Posts: 97
Joined: Tue May 03, 2005 1:19 pm
Location: Altrincham

Post by TimSharrock »

Could there be a market for bilingual versions, eg an echo Our Father with one group singing in latin with the "echo" in english/welsh/etc (or vice versa).

I fear that it would be hard to do well :?

(hello everyone...)

Tim
User avatar
gwyn
Posts: 1148
Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2003 3:42 pm
Parish / Diocese: Archdiocese of Cardiff
Location: Abertillery, South Wales UK

Post by gwyn »

Funny you should mention that, Tim, I've been working on just such an arrangement of the Hail Mary; English words sung by a cantor/schola while the choir/assembly sing the Latin words. It's always the middle bit that brings you to a grinding halt, isn't it?

I've shelved it for the time being and shall await the Holy Spirit's intervention, she generally sorts me out - and chooses exceedingly good popes too !

Welcome Tim.
User avatar
musicus
Moderator
Posts: 1605
Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2003 8:47 am
Location: UK
Contact:

Post by musicus »

Hello Tim, and welcome to the forum.

Musicus - moderator
Hare
Posts: 627
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2004 12:12 pm
Parish / Diocese: Angouleme Diocese, France.

Ratzinger, Liturgy and England

Post by Hare »

Merseysider wrote:Strange, too, that SC should suggest the Creed and the Pater Noster rather than those texts (like the Sanctus) which everyone should be singing.


Couldn't agree more, but I am interested in the spirit rather than the letter.

I was born in God's Own City, and my world did indeed end at 4 compass points (Prescot, Speke, Warrington and..........West Kirby - mum's family were from the Wirral!) but now I know I am part of a world-wide church. Insularity and catholicism (note small c) do not go hand in hand.
User avatar
contrabordun
Posts: 514
Joined: Sun May 23, 2004 4:20 pm

Post by contrabordun »

Benevenio wrote:the 'united' approach - we'll say it together, each in our own tongue.


I hate this - the resulting cacophany confuses me and makes it difficult to say the prayer in English. I always end up trying to shut out the rest of the congregation in order to be able to say the prayer silently in my head.
Merseysider
Posts: 430
Joined: Fri May 07, 2004 11:21 pm

Re: Ratzinger, Liturgy and England

Post by Merseysider »

Hare wrote: I am interested in the spirit rather than the letter.
And the "spirit" is what?

Is SC suggesting that we should all pray in a strange language every X weeks for the benefit of those who might find themelves in a strange country one or twice in their lifetimes?

Isn't that rather like taxing us all to pay for the foreign jaunts of the few?
User avatar
sidvicius
Posts: 231
Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2004 12:12 am
Location: UK
Contact:

Check your back issues

Post by sidvicius »

More of an observation, but a recent article in M&L (entitled "The Last Word") - sorry, can't remember who wrote it - puts a very persuasive case for us to be veering away from Latin. Not, perhaps, removing it all together, but being aware that it has a time and a place. Perhaps the mass is no longer either of these, and certainly not in 'bit-part' form?
Merseysider
Posts: 430
Joined: Fri May 07, 2004 11:21 pm

Post by Merseysider »

Worth reading Mgr Anthony Boylan on this one.
Music and Liturgy Issue 317, Spring 2005, Vol 31 No1
Post Reply