It is not, of course, a question of imitating Gregorian chant but rather of ensuring that new compositions are imbued with the same spirit that inspired and little by little came to shape it.
There are moments when the music does allow the prayer to come alive and to breathe – my example would be a cantor singing their own setting of a psalm (then you take it away and try to use it yourself, and it just isn’t the same), When it comes to the assembly, the spirit we need to capture is that which makes the people feel that this is their song. Now, if anyone writes an article which contains the essence of how to do that, I’d like to read it! Meanwhile, we keep hearing little instances of how the music lives for certain communities in their particular circumstances, and I am heartened by these – keep them coming.
When ideas appear in print they gain an air of authority. The question of liturgical music presented in a Catholic publication might look, to the casual observer, as though this is the way things are or are meant to be. It is not obvious that this is the personal view of one person in an independent publication. I don't think I'd have felt the same if I'd read his views on The Times or The Guardian.
I used to work for The Universe and The Catholic Times. I remember once losing an argument with my aunt over some church issue or other. She claimed to be in the right "because I read it in The Universe". I just smiled to myself.
For me, Plain chant is like a polite warning - "you are now in a sacred place - Respect this fact, or else..." If only there was something similar for our day-to-day sacred places.
Tsume Tsuyu wrote:Did the SSG ever put pen to paper? I don't subscribe to the Tablet so, although I had a sight of the original article, I haven't seen any responses.
Would it be possible to post the SSG's response on the forum?
I am finalising a response. I'll post it on here when I have given them a chance to print or reject it.