presbyter wrote:So let's have music that truly serves the spirit and the meaning of the new liturgical texts - so that these texts can be truly brought alive in song (whatever their mood) - and become heartfelt prayer. We're aiming for full, conscious, active - heartfelt! - participation - noble simplicity - and a sign of the heart's joy - aren't we? Let's have those in this seminar, please.
Hear! Hear! It's going to take some imagination and creativity to make these antiphons come to life.
Consider this. The texts in the missal or Graduale Romanum, dating from the late 8th century or earlier, were never intended to be sung by congregations, but by scholae cantorum, i.e. trained choirs. It is therefore arguable that, to make them more suitable for congregational use as refrains, they need some radical re-management. Even Professor László Dobszay, doughty custodian of all ancient texts, concedes in his projected Graduale Parvum that some antiphons need to be shortened for this purpose, the excised text being added to the psalm verses.
My purpose in compiling the Processional, far from setting some standard in hyperorthodoxy, is simply to present the texts as they are as a resource for composers. You will note in the sample provided (see above) that I have indicated where antiphon texts relate to the readings of the day. Psallite is another resource recommended for study.
Let me make one further point about the use of refrains in general. I have nothing against the suitable use of traditional-format hymns and songs, where they genuinely serve both the liturgy and the people celebrating it. But with the increasingly cosmopolitan, multicultural and mobile nature of our congregations, inherited repertoires of congregational music have an increasingly short shelf-life. An inspiring refrain (think Taizé, for example) can be attractive, easy to learn, memorable and also uniting. If we need more leaders, cantors - and yes, choirs - to make this possible, then what are we doing about it?