What if we just said, 'wait'

Well it does to the people who post here... dispassionate and reasoned debate, with a good deal of humour thrown in for good measure.

Moderators: Dom Perignon, Casimir

festivaltrumpet
Posts: 105
Joined: Mon Sep 29, 2008 6:47 pm

Re: What if we just said, 'wait'

Post by festivaltrumpet »

presbyter wrote: the text worked a lot better in prayerful proclamation than I thought it would


This is most encouraging to hear. One wonders how well the text would fare in a non-prayerful proclamation such as is sadly the case in many parishes. It is to be hoped that the nature of the text will highlight such non-prayerful proclamation in a manner that the current text does not. Further, it is to be hoped that there is sufficient vision to recognise that in such cases, the deficiency is in the proclaimer and not the proclaimed.
nazard
Posts: 555
Joined: Tue Sep 05, 2006 7:08 am
Parish / Diocese: Clifton
Location: Muddiest Somerset

Re: What if we just said, 'wait'

Post by nazard »

I am relieved that the words are being found prayerful. It was my impression on first reading that they would be. I am aware of the unfortunate choices of words made here and there, but I have a great sympathy with the style, which although criticised in some quarters as too latin, I find help to remind me that these words are deep and full of meaning. I think we need to look positively at these words, and to treat them as an opportunity to deepen our understanding of mass.
Post Reply